Your AI Tech Lead.

Spec-driven development for Claude Code

Production-ready code from Day 1.

Spec-driven development, enforced. Claude Code writes code fast: TLM Forge makes sure it's correct: a spec audit before any code, independent multi-agent review of your plan and your diff, and a commit gate that won't let work ship until an adversarial red-team pass clears.

The engineering discipline of a senior staff team, enforced on every feature.

The Problem

It shipped. Nobody checked it.

  • A missing auth check nobody flagged
  • An untested edge case in production
  • A review that never actually happened

TLM Forge checks it before it ships.

Every change gets an independent, adversarial review: a gate, not a best effort.

A GitHub pull request titled "Ship orders when payment succeeds" with the line ship(order) highlighted, and a dotted line from it to a TLM Forge terminal running its Stage 5 final audit, which lifts out a CRITICAL finding from the red-team reviewer: replaying the payment webhook runs ship(order) again with nothing checking the event was already handled, so the order ships twice, citing "payments/webhook.py, line 42" and marked "BLOCKED until resolved".

From your request to shipped,
one disciplined pipeline.

After install you manage none of this. TLM Forge hooks into your Claude Code flow: it syncs the architecture and gets your diagram signed off before a line of code is written, then puts the diff through an eight-agent adversarial Review Council before anything ships.

It gets sharper the longer it works with you.

TLM's memory layer persists across every session and project: architectural decisions, past bugs, and the conventions it learned the hard way. The proof is spec accuracy: the share of your work TLM anticipated before you wrote it.

Spec Accuracy Over Time

0% ↑ from 52%
80%60%40%
Wk 1Wk 2Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6Wk 7Wk 8Wk 9

Spec accuracy = what percentage of your work was anticipated by TLM's spec.
The gap is bugs, unplanned features, and missed edge cases. The line goes up because TLM learns from every commit.

Discipline, enforced:
not politely suggested.

Most tools recommend good practice and hope you follow it. TLM Forge makes the gates mechanical: independent adversarial review, tests-first, and a convergence rule that won't let work ship until critical issues are gone.

Stage 1 · Before any code

Spec audit, every time

Every change starts with an audit of hidden assumptions, threats, and rollback risk, before a line is written.

A feature request titled "Saved cards and payment retries" with requirement 1, "Retry the charge if a payment fails", highlighted, and a dotted line from it to a TLM Forge terminal running its Stage 1 spec audit, which lists six findings (assumptions, threats and rollback risks) and lifts out a CRITICAL finding that says the requirement doesn't say how many times to retry or whether a customer can be charged twice, citing "feature request, item 1" and marked "BLOCKED until resolved".
Stage 2 · Before agents spawn

Design sign-off gate

On Medium and Deep work, you get a flowchart and sequence diagram first: nothing builds until you approve it.

A "Payments webhook" sequence diagram at Stage B showing Checkout, Payments, Webhook and Orders, with a "skip if event seen" guard highlighted, and a dotted line to a TLM Forge terminal showing the Stage B visual diagram gate: the architecture sync and diagram are ready, no agents spawn until approval, then an "approve" command leads to "diagram approved, agents can spawn" and Stage 1 spec audit beginning, with a card confirming the design was signed off with replayed events skipped and nothing built before approval.
Stage 7 · Mechanically

TDD, auditor-enforced

Tests first, RED then GREEN, full regression every phase: enforced by an independent phase auditor, never skippable on a deadline.

Pre-ship · Independent QA

Live verification, end-to-end

A fresh QA agent, never the one that wrote the code, runs it against the real environment before it ships.

A live checkout confirmation page reading "Order confirmed" with a payment history entry of "1 charge, $108.00, Paid" highlighted, and a dotted line to a TLM Forge terminal running its Stage 6 live verification: a fresh QA agent pays with a saved card, pays with a new card, sends the webhook twice, confirms the customer was charged once after a timeout, and confirms the receipt email arrives, with all 12 of 12 checks passing and a card citing the checkout page and payment history as the source of the PASS verdict.
Post-audit · Anti-drift

SHA-anchored commit lock

After the final audit, pushes are blocked if HEAD drifts past the reviewed commit, so no silent changes slip in.

A "git log --oneline" output with the commit "3f9c2a1 verify webhook signature" highlighted below a newer unreviewed commit "8b41e07 retry delay", and a dotted line to a TLM Forge terminal where a "git push" is blocked because HEAD has drifted past the audited SHA to a commit nobody reviewed, with a card citing the final audit's red-team-reviewer verdict and reading "Blocked until Stage 5 re-runs".
Stage 8 · The gate

Convergence gate: ship at zero

A rule counts the real CRITICALs across every review and blocks shipping until they hit zero, with no merging around it.

Eight specialists.
Every gap caught before you ship.

The gates above are staffed by a bench of specialist agents. TLM Forge spawns each one cold, with a single sharp focus: so the threat-modeler isn't swayed by style, and no one reviewer has to catch everything.

review-council8 agents · spawned cold & in parallel
red-team-reviewerSECURITY
Thinks like an attacker with full code knowledge, so the gaps get sealed before anyone else finds them.
threat-modelerSECURITY
Surfaces the assumptions an attacker could exploit, so you can close them early.
architect-reviewer
Would a senior staff architect actually ship this design?
tester
What breaks under empty input, races, timeouts, partial failure?
code-reviewer
TDD compliance, pattern consistency, no surprises for the next dev.
phase-auditor
Was every promised item delivered, tested, and reversible?
ux-reviewer
Accessibility and platform conventions on anything user-facing.
general-purpose
Cost, ops, and docs: the cross-cutting gaps specialists miss.
~4× leanerthan re-running every review from scratch~35 agent runs vs ~145 cold fan-out
Efficient by design

Spec-driven, so it builds on itself: never from scratch.

Each round picks up where the last left off: later reviews verify prior findings instead of re-deriving them, the way a strong engineering team's spec and codebase get sharper over time. That's what lets the full council run on every change, not just the risky ones.

Others structure the work. TLM Forge enforces it.

BMAD-METHOD and GitHub spec-kit help an agent plan. Only TLM Forge blocks the merge until independent, adversarial review says the work is sound.

CapabilityTLM ForgeBMADspec-kit
Blocks the merge until every critical issue is resolved✓——
Adversarial reviewers: a threat-modeler at design, a red-team on the diff✓——
Ship or no-ship is a scored gate, not an opinion✓——
Enforced test-driven development with full-suite regression evidence✓——
Diagram and goal-contract sign-off before any code is written✓——

See the full comparison →

Ship with discipline. Founding-member pricing.

A subscription that pays for itself on the first bug it catches. Cancel anytime, annual is ~70% off the $349.99 list price. Lock in the launch rate.

~84% fasterto ship production-ready
~7× more bugsfound vs. vanilla Claude

Based on early-adopter data; your results will vary.

Enterprise
For larger teams, volume seats.
Let's talk
Bulk discounts · cancel anytime
Bulk pricing · support@tlmforge.dev

Everything in Pro, plus
  • Every Pro feature included
  • Bulk discounts, minimum 5 seats
  • Centralised billing across your team
  • Priority support

We can provide bulk discounts for teams. Minimum 5 seats, tell us your seat count and we'll tailor a quote.

Cancel anytime
No lock-in. Email us to cancel and keep access through your paid period.
Cancel anytimeSecure checkout via RazorpaySold by Neural Forge Technologies LLP
4.9/5 · trusted by 200+ engineering teams
“This one goes deep, reliably succeeds, and fits just how I need it. I've used it for three major features and every time it surfaced details I missed but were critical to catch. So many footguns avoided — saved me days of work down the road.”
Sharat VisweswaraSharat VisweswaraPrincipal Engineer @ Evocalize · ex-CTOView on LinkedIn →

Questions, answered

Yes, 10 full runs of the Pro recipe, no credit card required. When you hit the limit, subscribe to Pro for unlimited runs.

Not ready yet?

We drop the price from time to time. Leave your email and we'll let you know when the next price drop arrives, no spam.

No spam. Just a heads-up on the next price drop.

Built by an ex-Google Tech Lead & ex-AWS Tech Lead.

The same review discipline that ships at the world's most demanding engineering orgs, packaged for your Claude Code workflow.

Connect on LinkedIn →

The same engineering quality as
Google, Apple, and Amazon.

Production-ready code from day one: start free, or go Pro from $34.99/mo.

Get TLM

Cancel anytime · Secure checkout via Razorpay