Spec-driven development, enforced. Claude Code writes code fast — TLM Forge makes sure it's correct: a spec audit before any code, independent multi-agent review of your plan and your diff, and a commit gate that won't let work ship until an adversarial red-team pass clears.
The engineering discipline of a senior staff team — enforced on every feature.
After install you manage none of this. TLM Forge hooks into your Claude Code flow and runs the right stages automatically, in four acts — scaling rigor to the work.
Understand the work before a line of code is written.
TLM Forge reads your request, picks the intensity, announces it, and proceeds. Security surfaces auto-escalate to Deep.
Reconciles a living architecture document so the plan is grounded in your real component map — and detects drift.
Produces a flowchart + sequence diagram and, on Medium/Deep work, waits for your approval before any agents spawn.
Surfaces hidden assumptions, threats, cost, and rollback risk — before a single line is planned.
A structured, phased plan — each phase independently shippable and reversible, no irreversible step left unflagged.
AI coding tools are powerful but process-blind. They don't ask clarifying questions, don't test edge cases, and don't remember what went wrong last time.
Claude Code optimizes for velocity, not correctness. It happily writes the feature — nothing independently checks that the result is actually right before it lands.
Missing auth checks, unhandled edge cases, untested error paths, race conditions. The details you didn't explicitly think about are the ones that slip straight into production.
A single human reviewer is the bottleneck — and one pair of eyes misses what an adversarial panel of specialists would catch. Real review on every change just doesn't happen.
When Claude writes code, it has blind spots. On Pro, TLM Forge brings other vendors' models into the loop: Gemini and Codex join as independent, cross-model reviewers at the final adversarial audit. A different model catches what Claude's own review misses — and their findings feed the convergence gate you control, not a black box that ships on its own.
A Pro feature — bring your own Gemini and/or OpenAI key. Each skips gracefully if its key isn't set.
TLM's memory layer persists across every session and project — architectural decisions, past bugs, and the conventions it learned the hard way. The proof is spec accuracy: the share of your work TLM anticipated before you wrote it.
Spec accuracy = what percentage of your work was anticipated by TLM's spec.
The gap is bugs, unplanned features, and missed edge cases. The line goes up because TLM learns from every commit.
Most tools recommend good practice and hope you follow it. TLM Forge makes the gates mechanical: independent adversarial review, tests-first, and a convergence rule that won't let work ship until critical issues are gone.
Reviewers emit structured severity findings; a rule counts the real CRITICALs and blocks shipping until they hit zero — with synthetic CRITICALs injected for missing or lazy reviews. It can't ship until the CRITICALs hit zero, and you can't merge around it.
Every non-trivial change starts with an audit of hidden assumptions, threats, cost, and rollback risk — surfaced before the bug ships, not after.
On Medium and Deep work you get a flowchart and sequence diagram first — and nothing gets built until you approve it.
Tests first, RED → GREEN, full regression every phase. Enforced by hooks — not by willpower, and not skippable on a deadline.
A fresh QA agent — never the one that wrote the code — runs the finished feature against the real environment before it's marked done.
After the final audit, commits and pushes are blocked if HEAD drifts past the reviewed SHA. No silent changes slip in after review.
Gates that hold under a deadline — so production-ready is the only way out.
The gates above are staffed by a bench of specialist agents. TLM Forge spawns each one cold, with a single sharp focus — so the threat-modeler isn't swayed by style, and no one reviewer has to catch everything.
Each round picks up where the last left off — later reviews verify prior findings instead of re-deriving them, the way a strong engineering team's spec and codebase get sharper over time. That's what lets the full council run on every change, not just the risky ones.
A lifetime license — no subscriptions, no seats, no renewals. Around $1.50 a day over a year. Less than a coffee.
Based on early-adopter data — your results will vary.
We drop the price from time to time. Leave your email and we'll let you know when the next price drop arrives — no spam.
Built by an ex-Google Tech Lead & ex-AWS Tech Lead.
The same review discipline that ships at the world's most demanding engineering orgs — packaged for your Claude Code workflow.
Connect on LinkedIn →Production-ready code from day one — yours for life, from a single $499.
Get TLM30-day full refund · Secure checkout via Razorpay